
June 10, 1998
PRESS BRIEFING BY MIKE MCCURRY
THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
_____________________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 10, 1998
PRESS BRIEFING
BY MIKE MCCURRY
The Briefing Room
1:57 P.M. EDT
..................
................
Q Doesn't the Duma's action now kill any possibility
of a Moscow trip this summer?
MR. MCCURRY: It doesn't kill the prospects for
ratification of START II. That's of vital interest to the United
States and to the people of Russia as well, because it leads to
further reductions in nuclear arsenals that will make the world a
safer place.
But we don't take the postponement that the Duma has now
invoked as the last word on the subject and we still have a great
deal of confidence in the ability of the government to press for
ratification. We continue to press them for ratification.
Q Might you go to Moscow anyway?
MR. MCCURRY: Look, you've heard me on this subject
before. I've suggested to you there is not a direct hard linkage
between these two things, but there is a clear design on the part of
our government to deal with and advance the arms control dialogue we
have with the Russian Federation in an environment in which START II
has been ratified.
But we acknowledge that's not the only item on our
agenda. We've got a lot of work to do with the Russian Federation,
but it clearly will proceed better if it's in an environment in which
START II has been ratified.
Q But they're not ruling out a trip, in other words.
MR. MCCURRY: I think I'm not changing what I've told
you in the past on this in any way, shape, or form.
Q Didn't the link used to be harder, though?
Q It sounds little bit like you were. It sounds like
in the past, Mike, you've said --
MR. MCCURRY: The link has never been that hard; it's
been soft. And I've always made it just right -- sort of kneaded it,
so it comes out just perfect.
Q As far as I remember, you always said that on the
agenda would be START III, and if they haven't ratified START II then
what would be the purpose of starting new talks if they haven't done
the old talks?
MR. MCCURRY: You take great liberties with the profound
and nuanced way that I expressed much that same thought.
Q But he's right. You started backing way two or
three weeks ago.
MR. MCCURRY: I'm right.
Q You have to boil it down, though.
Q What are you really saying now, sans nuance?
Q Are you saying you were going? Is their
possibility that --
MR. MCCURRY: What I've said, what I'm really saying is,
we have not ruled out holding a summit prior to START II
ratification. But as I've also noted, the work that President
Clinton and President Yeltsin are going to do clearly will proceed in
a more fruitful environment if START II has been ratified.
Q But so it's possible that in July or this summer we
could be going to Russia?
MR. MCCURRY: I haven't heard any discussions of any
particular days and have no announcements for you now and will leave
you guessing. And since your travel plans always is the thing that
intrigues you more than anything else, it will be a good subject for
you to spend a lot of time on because it will take you away from
other subjects.
END 2:31 P.M. EDT