Briefings, Testimony, Decisions | ||
U.S. and Soviet aircraft at Travis Air Force Base, California. |
Congressional
scrutiny of U.S. treaty responsibilities was intense. In
March and April 1988, four congressional committees held
hearings on the INF Treaty.17
The U.S. Constitution vests in the Senate the power to
give its "advice and consent" on all treaties
negotiated and signed by the President. Senior officials
from the Reagan administration testified, including the
Chairman of the JCS, the military service chiefs, the
Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the
Director of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, and
the Director of the FBI. Practically every other week in
February, March, April, and May, General Lajoie briefed
the JCS, the Secretary of Defense, and senior officials
in the Defense Department on the status of inspection and
escort preparations. Lajoie appeared before congressional
committees, explaining planning and preparations for the
treaty mission. These briefings and testimony
incorporated the latest information from the technical
talks and provided current information on preparations
for extensive inspection/escort training exercises in the
United States and Europe in April and May. Similar
briefings were given to officials at the White House and
the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Sandwiched between these briefings and testimony was the decision on how to transport U.S. and Soviet inspection and escort teams. Understanding the airlift requirement was critical. Because of the structure of the treaty, the need would be especially intense during the first 60 days of inspections, the period known as the INF baseline. During that period, U.S. inspection teams would need daily flights into and out of Moscow and flights two or three times a week into and out of Ulan-Ude. At the same time, the U.S. portal monitoring team would be establishing its permanent inspection base at the Votkinsk Machine Building Plant in the Udmurt Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. This team also needed airlift support into and out of Moscow on a continuing basis. U.S. escort teams for Soviet inspectors also required airlift. When a Soviet team arrived at one of the entry points (for example, Frankfurt, Washington, or San Francisco), the U.S. escort team was obligated under the treaty to get them to the INF site within nine hours. This deadline began once the Soviet team chief specified the site to be inspected. For most Soviet inspections, OSIA would need a combination of air and ground transportation. In Europe U.S. missile sites were located in five nations--West Germany, Belgium, the Netherlands, Italy, and Great Britain. Commercial airline schedules would not meet the nine-hour time requirement. Air Force airlift planners and OSIA's transportation expert, Lt. Colonel Gerald J.K. Heuer, examined other options: leasing a fleet of commercial aircraft, using military airlift from the Air Force, or a combination of the two. The cost of leasing, over $50 million per year, was deemed excessive. The alternative was to assign the mission to the Air Force's Military Airlift Command (MAC). Following a briefing to the joint chiefs in late March, General Lajoie, Colonel McConnell, and Lt. Colonel Heuer flew to Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, on April 6, and met with General Duane H. Cassidy of MAC. General Cassidy said that MAC would take responsibility for transporting U.S. and Soviet teams, their equipment, and other logistical supplies. |
The U.S.
teams would fly on commercial airlines from OSIA
headquarters in Washington to field offices in West
Germany and Japan. From there, the teams would travel on
Air Force planes to the Soviet Union, East Germany, and
Czechoslovakia. Conversely, when Soviet inspection teams
arrived in Europe or the United States, an OSIA escort
team would meet them at the point of entry. Then,
depending on the distance, the Soviet inspectors would be
flown or bused to the inspection site. Within days of General Cassidy's decision, General Lajoie was able to incorporate this airlift arrangement into the April technical talks in Washington. There, discussions turned to practical issues such as military and civilian logistical flights, aircraft call signs, and housing requirements for the air crews.18 |
||
Mock Inspections | ||
Another key decision was when and how to conduct a series of full-scale, on-site training inspections at all of the U.S. INF missile sites in Europe and the United States. In early March, General Lajoie had asked Colonel Ronald P. Forest, then chief of the escort division, to begin planning for mock inspections. They would involve hundreds of inspectors and escorts and several thousand INF missile and support systems people, and would be held at all 31 U.S. INF missile sites in the United States and Europe. Forest, an advisor to the INF Treaty delegation and a former Pershing battalion commander, assembled a small group of officers and began developing a plan for the training exercise. Army Major John D. Allen, Army Captains Dalton D. Graham and James Laufenburg, and Air Force Captain Michael W. Slifka scheduled the teams, coordinated those schedules with the military services and sites, and set up a system of evaluation. After three weeks, Lajoie reviewed and approved their plan.19 | In 1988, the U.S. held full-scale mock training inspections at Air Force and Army INF sites in the United States and Western Europe. Soviet inspectors conducted similar mock training exercises at USSR INF sites in 1988. |
"READ, DIGEST, MEMORIZE THE TREATY. All of us have to be THE EXPERTS." Captain Olsen
|
OSIA's
mock inspections would run for a month, beginning on
April 7, and would simulate treaty baseline inspections
of every U.S. site. Inspection and escort teams would
follow the procedures specified in the treaty and the
protocols. The inspections would test the operations
plans developed by OSIA, the Army, the Air Force, and the
sites themselves. However, as the starting date grew
near, Colonel Forest and Colonel Robert McConnell, the
agency's director of operations, recommended
postponement. They believed that for logistical, service
coordination, and personnel reasons (several team chiefs
and members would not be available to participate) delay
would be the wiser choice.20 General Lajoie thought otherwise. He forced the issue, directing that the practice inspections must begin on April 7 at Greenham Common Air Base, England, and end by May 11 at all 31 sites. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee had completed its hearings with a favorable vote of 17 to 2 on March 30, 1988. Treaty approval by the full Senate could come within weeks. Once ratified, the treaty would enter into force quickly. Lajoie believed that the mock inspections were the key to readiness. They would test not only OSIA's inspection and escort teams, but also the Army and Air Force, which operated the INF missile sites, as well as the industrial corporations that owned the missile assembly plants. As the exercise progressed, it incorporated the use of military airlift, the new communications networks, and the provisions for operational security at every step in the inspection process. With Lajoie's decision, the pace of activity accelerated. Colonel McConnell notified each team chief and member immediately. He challenged them to "get it right the first time" and set up OSIA exercise controllers to critique each inspection.21 OSIA' s director of inspections, Navy Captain David E. Olson, penned a personal note to his team: "READ, DIGEST, MEMORIZE THE TREATY. All of us have to be THE EXPERTS."22 All 31 U.S. INF missile and missile-related sites listed in the Memorandum of Understanding participated in these mock inspections. Once a mock inspection began, the inspection teams communicated in Russian and conveyed their requests only to escort team chiefs and linguists. The inspection team used actual treaty site diagrams; they followed the treaty and its protocols. The entire site was usually inspected twice, with the escort team accompanying the inspectors at all times. By the end of the six weeks of mock training inspections nearly all of the American inspectors and escorts (with the exception of the portal monitoring teams) had been through one or more inspections.23 In Europe, at the 12 Pershing II and GLCM missile bases and depots, the mock inspections were seen as critical because most Soviet inspections would take place at these bases. In February and March, Air Force Colonel John Fer and Army Lt. Colonel Scott G. Lang had set up OSIA's European field office at Rhein-Main Air Base at Frankfurt, West Germany. In the United States, Air Force Colonel Gerald V. West and Army Lt. Colonel Claesen D. Wyckoff had set up an OSIA field office in Washington at Dulles International Airport. Near San Francisco, Colonel Thomas E. Smalls, U.S. Army, and Lt. Colonels Robert Yablonski and Stephen B. Boyd, USAF, established an OSIA field office at Travis Air Force Base. Each of these field offices participated extensively in the mock exercises. |
RECALLING
THE MOCK INSPECTIONS Lt. Colonel Robert Yablonski, USAF, remembered participating in the mock inspections in the spring of 1988. An experienced field grade officer, he had been an air attaché in the American Embassy in Moscow, an Olmstead Scholar to France, and a RAND Fellow prior to his work at OSIA's San Francisco Field Office. As one of the American senior escorts, Colonel Yablonski participated in many of the initial inspections. "The mock inspections were, no doubt, one of the wisest things we did. Whoever decided to do it, I give them great credit. They performed a number of functions internally in terms of identification with the mission, the escort mission, what it really meant to escort inspectors, and it helped reveal a lot about how inspections should go." "By actually doing the inspections, by making mistakes, it helped us immeasurably. In fact, it was in the interest of the United States to make mistakes, so that when the treaty went into force on June 1, 1988 and the real inspections began, the U.S. would have its act together." "The other very important thing about the mocks was the face-to-face contact between the inspectors and the escorts with the treaty-in-hand. I really felt that they had a great didactic and educational function in letting the people at the air bases and army sites learn what the Soviets were going to be like." "We acted on the principle that it was reasonable to expect a consistency of treatment across the gamut of Air Force installations, both in the United States and in Europe." "We found out that as you undertake anything, it helps to have a plan, it helps to have a schedule. What really emerged was the necessity to communicate to a broad spectrum of people. The inspection process involved a great deal of coordination to the logistical infrastructure. Then there was another infrastructure for security. All these things had to be done." "So what became evident during these mock inspections in 1988 was that OSIA didn't own any resources of its own, but that it had the charter to, pardon the word, influence all of these other people to do what had to be done under the requirements of the INF Treaty." Source: Interview, April 4, 1989 |
Davis-Monthan Air Force Base, Arizona, September, 1989. |
In
Washington, Marine Lt. Colonel Sebastian V. Massimini and
Army Major John D. Allen, together with SFC Jose R.
Amaya, SFC Glenn L. Clark, TSgt. Mark A. Havican, RMl
James O. Brooks, and RMl Michael A. Mallard, assembled a
staff to set up and run a 24-hour-a-day OSIA operations
center. This operations center participated in the mock
inspections, as did the Military Airlift Command. The
European Command also participated fully, experiencing
for the first time how on-site inspections would intrude
on military operations. That experience was invaluable.
OSIA escort teams were responsible for coordinating and
controlling the Soviet inspectors throughout the
inspection. During the mock inspections the OSIA escort
team chiefs, linguists, and members became familiar with
all aspects of the treaty, and they learned to work
closely with the Pershing II and GLCM site commanders. For Colonel McConnell the inspections were a real turning point.24 For General Lajoie they signaled "the most useful training that had been done."25 For the escort team chiefs and site commanders the inspections were a chance to work through coordination issues, especially with the military services and commands in Europe. The American military officers who would lead the teams into the Soviet Union also found the mock inspections useful, but still felt a measure of uncertainty.26 Apprehension ran high in the weeks following the final mock inspection at Comiso, Italy. In less than six weeks, Americans would be traveling into the Soviet Union to conduct inspections of Soviet military forces and missile sites never before visited by U.S. officials. Among the team chiefs, linguists, and inspectors, tensions increased rather than lessened as the date for the first on-site inspections approached. |
||
The Moscow Summit | ||
"Trust everybody, but always cut the cards." President Reagan |
On June 1,
1988, President Reagan stood in the Kremlin and presented
the INF Treaty and the U.S. articles of ratification to
General Secretary Gorbachev. The U.S. Senate had ratified
the treaty by a 93 to 5 vote on May 27; the instruments
of ratification had been flown to Moscow for the
ceremony. At the moment the two leaders exchanged
documents, the treaty entered into force. Thirty days
later, on July 1, both parties had the right to initiate
on-site inspections. Both intended to do so. From the beginning, OSIA's operational concept called for the forward deployment of inspection teams at agency field offices in Europe and Japan before departing for inspections in the Soviet Union. In mid-June, teams of inspectors departed from OSIA headquarters in Washington and flew east to Frankfurt, or west to Tokyo. At Rhein-Main and Yokota air bases, each team received inspection equipment, supplies, and final instructions before embarking on Air Force planes for the flights to Moscow or Ulan-Ude. U.S. portal monitoring inspection teams entered the Soviet Union in the same way, from Frankfurt through Moscow to Votkinsk.27 Just before their departure, President Reagan invited General Lajoie and 15 INF inspectors and escorts to the White House. The President listened to their plans in the Oval Office. There, surrounded by the departing American inspectors and escorts, he commented on their forthcoming mission: "Trust everybody, but always cut the cards."28 |
Previous Section | Table of Contents | Chapter Notes | Chapter Three