Treaty will reinforce
nonproliferation efforts
Seven nations have ratified the Comprehensive Nuclear
Test-Ban Treaty since the nuclear blasts in India and Pakistan four months ago,
reinforcing the importance of the test ban to strengthening global nonproliferation
efforts. Australia, Brazil, Germany, Grenada, Jordan, Spain and Tajikistan have
ratified since May, with Australia, Brazil, Germany and Spain among the 44 nations
whose ratification is required for the Treaty’s entry into force.
To date, 20 nations have ratified the Treaty, which has been before the U.S. Senate
for its advice and consent for nearly a year.
When the G-8 met in London to consider the serious global challenge of the tests in
South Asia, they did not abandon the Treaty, but rather highlighted its relevance to
strengthening nonproliferation efforts. The G-8 statement strongly endorsed the CTBT,
calling “... upon all states to sign and ratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test-Ban
Treaty rapidly to ensure its entry into force, and welcom[ing] the determination of
the member governments of the G-8 that have not yet ratified the Treaty to do so at
the earliest possible date.”
|
|
In order for the CTBT to enter into force, named member states of the Conference
on Disarmament with nuclear research and or power reactors -- a total of 44
countries -- must ratify the agreement. If, three years after signature,
one or more of these 44 states have not ratified the Treaty, the Treaty provides
for an annual conference of the countries that have ratified it to consider what
measures may be taken to accelerate the ratification process in order to facilitate
the early entry into force of the Treaty.
CTBT ratification by the United States will encourage further ratifications, just
as U.S. ratification of the Chemical Weapons Convention facilitated ratification
in Russia, Pakistan and Iran. As Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said after
the nuclear tests in South Asia, “...if we want others to refrain from nuclear
tests, and we do; others want us to promise the same; and we should. On this
critical issue, at this perilous time, our leadership should be unambiguous,
decisive and strong.”
|