efforts against would-be proliferators | ||
|
undermined by nuclear testing that the United States might fail
to detect. It further reflects our belief that the Treaty will effectively deter
violations in light of the significant possibility of detection in combination with
the high political costs if a violation is detected. Moreover, the Treaty’s verification
regime, along with our national intelligence means and diplomatic efforts, will limit an
evader’s options and provide us with the means to take prompt and effective counter action
should we suspect a violation has occurred. In sum, we believe that the benefits of the
Treaty to U.S. national security clearly outweigh the potential costs and likelihood of
undetected violations.”
|
data not previously
available to the United States. It is a net plus. The CTBT establishes global networks
of four different types of sensors ... that can detect explosions in different physical
environments. Data will be coming in continuously.... Some of this data will be recorded
at stations in sensitive parts of the world to which we would not otherwise have
access. ... The Treaty further provides for consultation and clarification of ambiguous situations
and confidence building measures that will enhance our confidence in our monitoring
capabilities. The Treaty also provides the legal basis and an international forum
with which to promote and enforce a global end to nuclear testing.”
| nuclear material to produce a simple fission weapon, the CTBT would force it to place confidence in an untested design (which military leaders might find unacceptable), and it would constrain the development of nuclear weapons beyond simple fission designs. Without access to testing data, a would-be proliferator cannot develop with any degree of confidence a compact boosted weapon. ... It would be a challenging task for an emerging nuclear weapon state, likely requiring nuclear explosive tests, to design nuclear weapons in the sizes, shapes and weights most dangerous to us -- compact weapons deliverable in long-range airplanes and missiles, or very small, low-yield, nuclear weapons to be used as terrorist devices or in regional conflicts. ...Quite apart from the sheer technical obstacles to nuclear weapon development posed by a CTBT, the existence of the Treaty will strengthen international nonproliferation standards and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty regime, and give the U.S. a stronger hand to lead the global nonproliferation effort.” |
Produced by the White House Working Group on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty For more information on the CTBT: Phone: 202-647-8677 Fax: 202-647-6928 |
---|